• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ubuntu had (I don’t know if it still has) an additional contrib section in the sources.list for binary packages from “partners” without source code available, like e.g. Spotify.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry, I mixed that up. It was named Canonical partner or something like that and contained only binary packages. Debian contrib are free packages with dependencies in non-free. While non-free are packages with not DFSG compliant source code (but with source code).

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That is not correct. Nonfree has software that is proprietary but jot firmware. Nonfree-firmware has the proprietary firmware.

          • Successful_Try543@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yes, since Bookworm, there is also non-free-firmware which before was located in non-free. I’ve skipped that for simplicity, as both follow the same rules and non-free-firmware was introduced basically for convenience.

            Do you know if either of the non-free repos contain binary files without having the source available?

              • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                OK, TY. I’ve thought, there were just downloader packages, containing scripts to download the firmware binary from the device manufacturer and install it on the system, like e.g. the one for the Broadcom wireless driver.