• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    and you have a choice with Debian. You can run:

    • Stable if you want stability, meaning it doesn’t change often (minor updates only).
    • Testing if you want newer packages that have at least gone through some level of testing. They’ve been in unstable for at least 3-10 days with no major bug reports.
    • Unstable/sid if you want to assist the Debian project by reporting bugs (which is always appreciated!), or want the “breaks all the time” experience of other distros.
    • forrcaho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Debian unstable doesn’t break all the time, tho. There’s only been a handful of times in my 27 years of using it that something got truly borked.

      (That’s not counting times when two packages have the same file and there’s a conflict. That’s trivial to resolve once you’ve seen it a few times. Even that is relatively rare.)

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        Arch doesn’t break all the time either, but it’s a meme and therefor 100% true.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Debian unstable doesn’t break all the time, tho.

        Yeah, it was just a response to the Arch memes since I’m sure Arch doesn’t break all the time either.