• cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Apple deployed a library I wrote to every mac on the world, and additionally bundles it with Xcode.

    Apple users reported some bugs, that‘s how I found out.

    I never heard a word from them. No patches, no bug reports, nothing, they didn’t even bother to refresh the bundled version.

    I think in the meantime they removed it from macOS but still bundle it with Xcode.

    I mean, I didn’t any money, but some appreciation would’ve been nice, and a version refresh…

    If you are curious: it is this library: https://github.com/ckruse/CFPropertyList

    Edit: appreciation as in: a mail with a notice that they did so.

        • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can use your library for commercial projects that you have. Just have dual license that requires payment for commercial use or something similar. You don’t have to pay yourself

          • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            To be honest, I wasn’t aware of this option when I wrote this library. Nowadays I would chose this path.

            • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I think that’s why Github suggests MIT as default. Unaware people will just put that. Most open source people just code things they want without thinking much on other aspects. We really need some sort of enforcement to stop companies banking on voluntary work done for the community.

    • Matt/D@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      6 months ago

      Really funny/interesting that they use an external library to handle a format that they created!

      • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, I was surprised, too. I guess they implemented stuff using Ruby and didn’t bother to write an in-house implementation. 🤷‍♂️

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s probably a single dev that made the decision, then moves onto something else. They (probably?) don’t have the ability to just raise a recurring PO etc to easily pay you and don’t care enough to worth through the paperwork.

      If you had a paid licencing model they may have done it, or just found another lib/ wrote their own.