Today, I wanted to have another go with nix. Previously I just read about it and didn’t do anything for a couple of months. Now, I installed nix package manager with very few lines of code and two more to install many packages as described in his post. Installation was very fast on my banana laptop. Until now I used distrobox but I always wondered which distro/ package manager to use. What’s your experience with it? For now, I’ll test it. It’s super easy to use. It may not be straight forward to a linux newcomer but if you know what you want, e.g. ffmpeg you can just add it with home-manager edit and install it with home-manager switch. So far, I love it!

  • SolarPunker@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Bazzite user here and I’m using flatpaks whenever possible and distrobox for everything else; which are the benefits of Nix over these?

    • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      It’s faster than distrobox, it’s not within a box but on host, it’s easier than most package managers. I still go for flatpak first but for everything else I use nix. Especially for programming environment it looks to be much better than distrobox

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Homebrew for CLI. Distrobox needs to be used with Arch, at least the Fedora boxes are literally not possible to system upgrade.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Nix is useful for CLI packages, which aren’t very simple to use through flatpak. It also has far more packages, and is very useful for creating development environments.