• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The direct transfer of power in tech is often to someone that will carry the torch. It’s quite rare that a successor is picked that has been at the company for years, but wants to change practically everything about it. For that reason, I can see Gabe passing to a like-minded person that already knows that they are a succession candidate.

    But ultimately none of us know Gabe, or what he plans to do. He may have a 100 step plan to secede power, or he might get to 65, say “that’ll do” and just sell up and retire to a remote island somewhere. The plans might have been in place for years, or he might not want to consider Valve without him. Hell, he might not even think that Valve should exist without him. It’s impossible to guess, so it’s not worth worrying about…

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Remember when google didn’t do evil? Remember when they were hip, cool and not the living nightmare of a corporation we see of them today?

        • elauso@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So this really doesn’t alleviate any concerns for Steam. They too might be just 2 CEO changes away from sending their users to hell.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It seems worth worrying about if only to try and make valve think about the future.