• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hard to imagine a Linux user would want to run anything on hardware that costs a fortune and is also completely and intentionally unupgradeable and irreparable…

    Much less that they would go to such great lengths to bring such software into existence.

    • joojmachine@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      Easy to imagine when you understand that this is developed to support hardware that is widely popular and that will be sold by a lot less in the second-hand market in a couple of years, and that this makes far easier for people that are currently stuck in this walled garden to experiment with free software.

        • Chump [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          True, but the M1 MacBooks have really taken a beating in price. And the Airs were already quite a good deal to start with, so they do still seem competitive (8GB RAM notwithstanding). Been using a base model air since launch, and unless I hit swap super hard (I rarely do) it’s still great :)

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s not a whole lot of good options for decent ARM PCs and the M1s are legitimately pretty good machines, repairability aside.

      Even if you can’t repair them at least it’s pretty much guaranteed they can at least have their OS upgraded to a libre one. There’s going to be millions of them on the used market in a few years for cheap.

      I have zero complaints about the hardware of my work provided MacBook Pro, very nice machine to use overall.

      Are they the best bang for the buck? No. But Linux isn’t just about getting as much as possible for as little money as possible. Not everyone wants to daily drive an old bulky ThinkPad because it’s free-er. I’m happy with my framework but the battery life, keyboard and touchpad are quite inferior compared to my work MacBook. I wouldn’t buy one for myself, but I can recognize it’s still a nice machine and it’s much better than whatever crap Microsoft is pushing out with its Surface line.

    • ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Meh, if just wanting a lightweight laptop that’s fast even when unplugged there’s people who would be OK paying $700 for a M1 MBAir or a bit more for a 16GB version. They’re great laptops, the Rust compiler is very fast on M1/2 and with no fan noise. If buying Apple Refurbished they’re like new.

      • pukeko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m on a refurb M2 Air that I picked up from Apple for peanuts. It took me about 15m to get NixOS running on the thing, and it’s going to last me for 10 years, if my old MBP is anything to go by.

        Also, regardless of the hardware politics, I’m not sure I’ve been in awe of a project as much as I have the Asahi team. They’re just doing so much so quickly and with such command of the subject … and they’re so young. It’s a joy to watch them work.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sadly, Apple is doing ARM CPUs for desktop/laptop PC incredibly well, and at a cheaper price than just about any competitor.

      Before the Macbook Pro M1 I would’ve hard agreed with you, but this sentiment no longer goes with the current ARM PC’s that they’re selling.