• Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    well, they’ve had euphemisms and dog whistles since forever, and the people who were direct with their bigotry are still direct with it. this could even be seen as a step back from outright bigotry, implying that some of these people are less comfortable expressing direct transphobia / racism / sexism with the understanding that they are in fact losing power

      • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        because being against equal rights for people especially women’s and LGBT rights is still extremely bigoted, especially if it’s because you’re upset at the loss of power over those groups, whether or not they see themselves as bigots

        • IceMan@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, there’s nothing said about being against in the comment you’re replying to. Just that changing the term to woke is not necessarily bad. Where did you take that from?

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is true except for the part where anyone smiles naively, as though the dog whistle isn’t delivered in the most transparent manner imaginable

      • masquenox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nope. Right-wing ideology exists for one reason and one reason only - to protect power and privilege. We can’t leave reactionary politics behind because the people that benefit from it and are protected by it literally owns everything - including the violent goon squads.