• drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think wayland has potential but in it’s current state it’s just half baked. Once more protocols get merged, maybe in a decades time Wayland should be quite flexible and robust.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s how I feel as well. IMO it’s ridiculous that Fedora wants to remove xorg completely from the repos in the next version.

      • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is ridiculous. Nothing like says f you to a large percentage of your user base like pushing out a solution that doesn’t work for them.

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The wildest thing is that current xorg package is maintained by the community and they’re still removing it completely because “xorg is taking up too much dev time”.

      • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It does have potential. I think anyone denying that is simply wrong. the issue with wayland is purely how slowly it moves and the fragmentation. Now the fragmentation is actually in large part due to how slowly it moves. There are numerous WIP protocols that will greatly decrease fragmentation when all are merged.

        I can’t wait because it seems like it will happen in the short future of one or two decades xD