• Vexz@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I get that but it’s a dick move by the author of that article to publicly speak bad about a product and then don’t even wanna listen to what that person who made that product has to say to defend it. Especially if there’s some false information that get’s spread by that article. I’m not saying anything written in that article is true or false - just explaining the situation from Vlad’s view.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      that article

      it’s a post on a personal blog of a person on the internet. a blog post. not an article.

      • Vexz@kbin.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Blog post or article - whatever. The effect is the same: It’s on the internet, people read it and get influenced. Just because I picked the wrong word doesn’t kill my point. I’m sure you get what I meant.

      • corgi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personal blog on a public Internet is kind of an oxymoron.

        The blog post is close enough to an article.