They knew when to hold em. Knew when to fold 'em. Just not when to walk away and when to run.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wasn’t paywalled for me. Wired allows a certain number of views per month so it’s not always obvious you’re posting something paywalled.

      • SoManyChoices@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I do too and it works great. Unfortunately, I tend to be on my iPad in the evenings or early mornings, so I get stymied.

    • Evergreen5970@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll guess that if you bought a subscription to the website, you don’t see the paywall. So you might share it like anything else cool online, forgetting that this thing is paywalled and not everyone will be able to see it.

    • pips@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Either it’s not paywalled for them or it’s still good journalism and maybe journalists shouldn’t work for free.

      • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No one implied they should work for free. In fact (according to rumors) there are several alternatives for writers to monitize their content without completely walling off the articles.

          • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Google “how writers monitize their content on the internet” it should give you some good insights, as it’s not a very complicated topic.

            • pips@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Oh fascinating, the top response is working for a subscription-based publication that has editorial staff and pays them. The second is freelancing for a subscription-based publication by selling articles to them. Wow.

              • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re clearly so skilled with reading, but maybe if you can count past two, you can see the alternatives I mentioned previously.

                • pips@lemmy.film
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You mean the rumored several alternatives, that I asked you to elaborate on, and you told me to Google? Yes, clearly you listed specifics.

                  • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Buddy, I really won’t explain something to you that you should be able to figure out in less than 8 seconds. If you truly can’t figure out that advertising, sponsorships, and affiliate programs exist there’s nothing I can do to help you You’re clearly challenged and I wish you luck going foreward…

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Use firefox browser desktop mode and click the reader mode icon next to the url. it pulls the article text out so you can still read it without the paywall

      • prole@beehaw.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Reader mode is clutch for getting around paywalls. I’m just waiting for the day it suddenly stops working.