Employees say they weren’t adequately warned about the brutality of some of the text and images they would be tasked with reviewing, and were offered no or inadequate psychological support. Workers were paid between $1.46 and $3.74 an hour, according to a Sama spokesperson.

  • samwise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    But that’s exactly what’s happening. Bloodsucking capitalists have decided that AI is a cheaper option than paying people a living wage, so creatives are losing their jobs.

    Instead of actually learning how to create art, shitbag grifters claim theyre “taking the power back from creatives” and doing nothing but stealing from actual creatives to make some sort of soulless synthesis, leaving actual creatives high and dry. For just one example, look at how many publishing outlets have stopped taking submissions because of the overwhelming flood of AI spam.

    All the while people are out here trying to make ends meet and are being forced into shitty, low paid jobs or gig work

    • Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he/she was referring to the sole purpose of AI being developed is to create an additional subscription model that serves both ads and bullshit, locked to infrastructure of google or metas choice.

    • ReCursing@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your complaint here is entirely with capitalism and has nothing to do with AI. It’s a legitimate concern, but it;s fart larger problem than new ways of making pictures. Aim your opprobrium at the correct targets