Sexually explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X (formerly Twitter) over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated fake pornography and the challenge of stopping it from spreading.

X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wow this is going to be interesting from multiple fronts for me especially.

    First, I’m a huge swiftie - and Taylor is probably not going to take this lightly. Who she’s going to target will be a more interesting question. (Shameless plug for !taylorswift@poptalk.scrubbles.tech if you want to join our small community)

    Second, as a nerd who has dabbled with generated art - thank you trolls for ruining it for all of us. This is just going to beg for regulations that is going to ruin the generative AI world - as if we didn’t have enough regulations barreling towards the area with copyright issues.

    Third, as someone who hates Musk - I hope everything focuses on him and the platform formerly known as Twitter.

        • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is that hatred, or fear, that I hear in this comment?

          That’s “suppressing theft masquerading as art is awesome” you hear in that comment.

            • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              29
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ah, it was the third option, ignorance.

              Oh, I’m not at all ignorant of how horrible generative " art " is, but I appreciate you checking on me.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                5 months ago

                If it’s horrible and it’s also “masquerading” as human art, what does that say about human art?

                  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No, I’m just pointing out the common contradiction I see in threads like this, where people argue that AI is both a big threat to “traditional” artists and also that AI is terrible compared to “traditional” artists. It can’t really be both.

                • Gamma@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Misunderstanding doesn’t make the comment into the type of gotcha you think it is

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 months ago

      In doesn’t matter. Sophisticated models are open-source and have already been forked and archived beyond all conceivable hope of regulation. There’s no going back.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is just going to beg for regulations that is going to ruin the generative AI world

      One can only hope! Fingers crossed!!!