• Essence_of_Meh@kayb.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    As much as I agree with his sentiment, this title is bullshit - he never wrote “gamers don’t want subscriptions” but that they shouldn’t want that due to where it might lead.

    “Gamers” aren’t some hivemind entity that wants a specific thing. Many people don’t worry whether an idea pushed by the publishers will have a long term negative effect on the industry, they just want to have fun with their hobby.

    Look at microtransactions - there’s a lot of negative discussion about them and yet they bring huge amounts of money, who’s to say if the same won’t happen with subscription services? We might not like it but majority doesn’t necessarily care.

    Sorry for being pedantic about a title but third-parties changing someone’s words is a bit of a pet peeve of mine.

    • style99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Micros rake in the cash because they exploit the stupidity of “whales” (people with more money than sense).

      • Essence_of_Meh@kayb.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        My point is that however you feel about microtransactions they are successful and that’s why they’re so common.

        With subscription services you and me can think “I want to own it and play whenever” but a lot (not only casual) players see it as “I pay a few $ and get access to a huge library of games I can try out for the next month”.

        As I wrote initially, just because more dedicated audience doesn’t like the direction industry is moving in doesn’t mean majority will care enough to stop it.