mac@programming.dev to Software Gore@programming.dev · 7 months ago1080p Universeprogramming.devimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1210arrow-down11
arrow-up1209arrow-down1image1080p Universeprogramming.devmac@programming.dev to Software Gore@programming.dev · 7 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squaremac@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up114·7 months agoTriggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·7 months agoLudicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.
Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.