I am ashamed that I hadn’t reasoned this through given all the rubbish digital services have pulled with “purchases” being lies.

  • FeminalPanda@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I buy water, I own it. It just passes Thur my body or shower and pipes. That’s like saying you don’t own your tires as they wear away. You can own consumables. I get your underlying point about theft is more then taking away something. You could be depriving someone of money they would have made. Same with copyright theft. Someone buys your product and copies it then sells it. They didn’t steal from you directly but still caused harm. Piracy is a service issue, if things you buy on that service don’t work people will stop using that service. I’m not going to download 12 game launchers to play the games I want, I’ll stick with steam. Same way with tv/movies.

    • SciPiTie @iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      “muddy waters” is a saying, I don’t think you should take OP literally. The Rest you’ve written seems to agree with their sentiment btw.

      • FeminalPanda@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ahhh, thanks I misunderstood. I do agree but also I have a Plex server. I started it when I worked at blockbuster. Technically even ripping your Blu-rays can be illegal so, you have to find your one morals and not rely on laws.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same with copyright theft

      Is this when you steal someone’s copyright and collect licensing fees posing as the legitimate copyright holder?

      They didn’t steal from you directly

      Or indirectly.

      still caused harm.

      Maybe, maybe not. But no theft occurred.

      • FeminalPanda@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I meant infringe on the copyright. I don’t think what Disney and some others are doing is right with extending it but I do think the person that created the things should have some legal protection from it being copied for a bit.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Copyright infringement isn’t theft, that’s the main point. It’s breaking a rule that the government created giving people a temporary (now extremely long term, but temporary) right to control the spread of ideas. Whether or not you approve of that law is beside the point. The point being, theft is as old as the ten commandments, if not older. Copyright is a new thing that’s only a few centuries old.