Who cares if nobody can work, the important is that those illegal streams are blocked

  • rhabarba@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good news. Hopefully this will help to finally break the de facto monopoly of Microsoft’s GitHub and bring the distributed aspect of Git - away from gatekeeper platforms - back into the foreground.

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Based

      …but this will realistically just spawn some new mirrors and proxies because the vast amount of projects hosted there definitely won’t ever move away.

      Anyway, I am doing my part! (With my irrelevant profile)

      • rhabarba@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        the vast amount of projects hosted there definitely won’t ever move away.

        That’s what they said about Sourceforge though.

        • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Github probably won’t shoot themselves their userbase in the dick quite as spectacularly as Sourceforge did, though.

        • crank@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          To be fair there are still oodles of projects there. I end up on source forge regular basis.

          • rhabarba@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            One of the reasons might be that the number of SVN hosting facilities has decreased over the past two decades.

          • rhabarba@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh, come on. It wasn’t that bad! At least it granted (and still grants) the freedom of choosing which VCS shall make your day harder than necessary.

        • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess. I haven’t lived through its golden age as a developer, but, seeing it now, anything would be better than Sourceforge IMO, so I would understand why people would move away even just for practical reasons

      • Aatube@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder why people favor codeberg so much over things like gitlab. It has an ugly UI from ancient GitHub…

        • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was on GitLab for a time (and still keep the account for following stuff and maybe contributions), but felt it wasn’t as free and community focused as I would have liked to, so I decided to move away and went to Gitea (the hosted instance), shortly after I discovered Codeberg which aligns with my ideals even more, so I went to try it and it stuck.
          The UI isn’t that bad in my opinion and it’s more responsive than GitLab’s, so I appreciate it.
          Not to say that it’s the perfect platform of course, at least not yet, I miss GitLab for the easy actions/CI and deployment of pages, but I’m hoping that Forgejo actions will land soon enough and make things better.

          Note: recently I found out a userstyle that tries to modernize the UI by following a Material You-like interface called Gitea Modern, don’t know if it’s still holding up since it’s been archived

          • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Really gitlab went down the niche client path and no longer is a non Microsoft alternative? Sadge, at least I know about codeberg now.

            • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              No no, don’t get me wrong, it very much still is, it’s really great for what it is, but for my own purposes it’s a bit too much maybe, and I never thought to come back also because I was, and still am, anticipating federation on Gitea/Forgejo, I didn’t expect that GitLab would add that in as well, so now that’ll be a moot point when the relevant merge requests do land

          • Aatube@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s not bad per se, but it leaves a lot to be desired and I think it’s about as responsive as GitLab.

        • rhabarba@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Codeberg is supposedly located in the EU while not requiring self-hosting, maybe that’s why.

          • crank@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Codeberg is a free/nonprofit hosted instance of Forgeo. Forgeo is a fork of Gitea created by Codeberg about a year ago when the governance of Gitea changed suddenly.

            You can selfhost either Forgeo or Gitea.

            There are other hosted instances of forgeo and gitea also available.

            Gitlab is a hosted instance if gitlab.

            You can also self host gitlab.

            I assume there are other hosted instances of gitlab tho i cant think of any off the top of my head.

              • PlexSheep@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                What’s the point of a local git server? If you’re after that why not just use a regular Git repo?

                • deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Easier ci/cd integration and viewing diffs from my phone on the toilet. Nothing I can’t do with regular git, it would just take more effort.

              • crank@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Uh well idk you personally so hard to say.

                For me i like the remotely hosted ones.

                Lots of other people run gitea locally.

            • rhabarba@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I know, but most people are lazy these days (and self-hosting stuff in the EU has become a legal battle against every week’s new rules).

              • Aatube@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t think you understand what I mean. It has its “main instance” which most people use. It’s just open source so you have the option of self hosting.