Of course without committing a crime before and without saying anything else.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    So New Zealand doesn’t have a concept of the courts can’t make you testify against yourself? That surprises me.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Of course we do.

      But it derives from common law via the New Zealand Bill of Rights and has nothing whatsoever to do with the US Constitution’s amendments.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thank you for helping to prove my point. When the OP was saying take the fifth he was talking in a genetic way. In other words walking into the police station and taking that countries variation of the fifth. He just didn’t bother typing it fully out like that because it was obvious what his point was. It’s obvious that new Zealand doesn’t have the literal fifth amendment but they have the equivalent of it. Again thank you for helping to prove my point.

        When I asked “doesn’t new Zealand have that concept” I new they did. I was trying to get you to understand what the op was trying to say.

    • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “The fifth” is American. They have the same or similar concept in other countries, they just have different names for it than “the fifth amendment”.

      Plead “the fifth” in NZ and they’ll tell you that you watch too much American television.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know that. I was trying to get him to understand that the op was talking in a generic sense. Both op and myself realize that new Zealand has an equivalent concept of the fifth. Op wasn’t trying to say walk in and literally say “plead the fifth” but walk in and do the equivalent of that.

        People get way to literal when they don’t need to be.

        • yanyuan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re right. I thought everyone here knows “the 5th” and it’s just shorter than “the right to remain silent”. However, most people seem to have got the right idea.

            • andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Even those that are complaining about the op using the term “the fifth” knew what it basically translated to,

                • andrewta@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You personally might not have heard about it. Look at the other comments. It’s obvious most did.