Mullvad gives you a discount if you pay with crypto, and monero is supposed to be the private crypto. What is the best way to get Monero? I’m in Canada

https://mullvad.net/en/pricing

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Mining it for two or three weeks usually pays my 3 month plan at airvpn, with a modern AMD processor, not sure how the modern intel processors mine. It’s probably the best way to anonymously obtain xmr. Xmrig has good documentation and is fairly easy to set up. Cake wallet has a way to purchase crypto with a cc, but not xmr directly, would have to purchase litecoin then swap to xmr in the app.

    • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Mining isn’t economically worth it and it’s also bad for your components’ health as well as the environment

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 days ago

        Mining on a cpu is much less taxing than a gpu, and if you do it intermittently and do not run all cores there’s no additional strain on hardware.

            • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I believe if it was worth it to mine, everyone would do it until it is not anymore, especially in countries where electricity is extra cheap

              After testing on my machine, I ended up losing more than 10x the amount I paid in electricity in France. I’m not sure it’ll be better elsewhere. This was at 0.20€/kWh

            • utopiah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              solar helps that number even more

              Wouldn’t that assume you are not using all the electricity coming from your panels?

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Exchanging money is also not economically worth it. And if you only pay for renewable electricity it isn’t bad for the environment either, at least on paper.

            • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              The components health section is probably nearly void, it seems like the lifespan of a CPU isn’t impacted if it doesn’t overheat. You’re probably right on that, I’m not a hardware expert though.

              Mining seems not worth it imo, based on my experience, but someone told me otherwise 🤷

              It is most certainly bad for the environment. Even if you use green energy, the infrastructure used to deliver the energy isn’t green when initially created and has a limited lifespan. Also, you probably remove green energy from people that didn’t care at the same time, so it ends up having a negative impact. If the green energy production % doesn’t change, then someone uses more non-green energy if you start using green.

              • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                I didn’t even address the component wear because I didn’t know either way. 😁

                But as long as you pay for green energy none of that money will go towards supporting non-green infrastructure. So it should incentivise the energy companies to invest more into green ones.

                Of course it doesn’t change where your energy is really coming from. Most likely from the gas plant around the corner. But maybe from your rich neighbour’s solar panels.

                • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  But as long as you pay for green energy none of that money will go towards supporting non-green infrastructure. So it should incentivise the energy companies to invest more into green ones.

                  I believe people getting non-green energy will just get less green energy, at least that’s how I would imagine it if there was already enough green energy for the ones who demand it. Instead of making more green energy, they’ll just send less green energy to the people that aren’t paying for green energy. If your country doesn’t produce a lot of it, then yea it’ll certainly incentivise the production of it, but I feel like keeping green energy only for premium payers, without developping infrastructure is more worth it to them.